ISIS concerns at core of Afghan negotiations

The start of officially recognized talks, sanctioned by the Afghan president, with the Taliban is in itself a remarkable event. But a closer look reveals a more curious underlying motive: the growing presence of the so-called Islamic State is forcing participants in the Afghan conflict to rethink their tactics and strategy.
Afghanistan
Source:Reuters

As participants in Afghanistan’s official talks with the Taliban begin to rethink their strategy in the backdrop of the looming threat of the Islamic State’s spread eastwards, chances of reaching an agreement appear to be improving. However, there is the possibility that any arrangement might prove ineffective in dealing with the threat from the IS threat. The complex war of wits and nerves in the fight against the spread of the IS brand of Islam requires not just the intervention of a leading power, but also cooperation among several influential countries. Given the proximity of Afghanistan to the post-Soviet republics of Central Asia and Russia’s borders, Moscow cannot remain indifferent to Afghanistan, where the Islamic State is a growing worry.

News from Kabul

The dispatch of a delegation to Pakistan to begin talks with the Taliban was announced in early July by President Ashraf Ghani. The announcement triggered numerous questions: Why in Pakistan? Why right now? Is it recognition of the Taliban’s defeat or official Kabul’s failure? What common ground is there?

At first glance, the Afghan president’s announcement was not directly related to the increasing reports of intense fighting in eastern Afghanistan, where groups swearing allegiance to the Islamic State are battling not only the official Afghan army, but also units under the Taliban, which traditionally has a strong foothold in the east. Against the backdrop of these reports, it is difficult not to be struck by how rapidly and effectively ideas and information spread in the modern world, taking physical form and forcing even the most powerful players in world politics to sit up and take note.

The explosive potential of ISIS

Just a year has passed since the official proclamation of the Islamic State. Even if one acknowledges that ISIS militants have proved themselves an effective force on the battlefield in Iraq and Syria, it is hard not to wonder at how quickly the idea of ​​Islamic State has gained momentum among Islamic extremists thousands of kilometers from Iraq and Syria, with no direct link to ISIS. It used to take groups such as Al-Qaeda years to build a command and operational structure, which even then resulted in a fringe organization known only to members and experts for a long time. Today, however, after just one year, Islamic State has the allegiance of both experienced groups (for instance, in Afghanistan) and lone-wolf terrorist rookies.

ISIS effectively exists in two forms — as a functioning terrorist proto-state and as the inspiration for a global alliance of militant Islamic fundamentalists. In the space of just one year, this idea has been sold all over the planet, attracting even Taliban members in eastern Afghanistan, who have turned their weapons against their former commanders and leaders in Qatar and Pakistan. Curiously, the news about the start of talks in Pakistan revealed a split between these two factions of the Taliban leadership; the Qatar group, until recently recognized as the senior partner, protested against what it saw as the machinations of the Pakistani intelligence services in the negotiating process.

Pakistan’s elaborate game

Needless to say, it is out of the left field to see the Taliban criticizing the Pakistani intelligence services, which many consider to be the creators and chief sponsors of the movement. To all appearances, the Qatari faction either fears losing control over Taliban troops in Afghanistan, or has already lost it. Recently, (though not officially) Afghanistan has voiced accusations against Islamabad that ISIS units on Afghan soil are just another project on the part of the Pakistani intelligence services, who have lost faith in the Taliban. If these allegations are true, Pakistan is clearly playing with fire: if the number of groups pledging allegiance to the “terrorist international” is on the rise, they are set to become a self-sufficient force, which will reduce the ability of Pakistani intelligence to preempt or even guide events in Afghanistan. In any case, Islamabad’s support for the talks between the Taliban and official Kabul testifies to Pakistan’s interest in stabilizing the situation in its neighbouring country.

Given that all sides in the region want stability in the country, it is not surprising that they are eager to sit behind the table. Islamic State is a new player in Afghanistan, but one that could mix up the cards. For ordinary fighters inspired by the ideas of Islamic fundamentalism and the struggle against the West, the contrast is plain to see: on one side is the Taliban, a regime which held out for just a few weeks against international intervention in Afghanistan, and on the other is Islamic State, which continues to expand its influence in a climate of general confusion and indecision on the part of both West Asian rulers and Western capitals.

The common enemy

The reality is of course more complicated, but propaganda-wise the Taliban is finding it hard to compete with ISIS. Therefore, there is every indication that the consolidation of Islamic State in Afghanistan is one of the main reasons for kick-starting talks between the Taliban and Kabul. These negotiations even have the backing of the United States, and US officials are involved as observers, as too are Chinese diplomats. A quick glance at the map shows that the east of Afghanistan, where ISIS has a foothold, is a stone’s throw from Chinese Turkestan, where Islamic fundamentalists are not in short supply and Islamic State propaganda is doing the rounds.

As ISIS becomes more active in the east, the Taliban is consolidating in the north. The past couple of months have seen sporadic heavy fighting around the region’s central city of Kunduz. Eye-witnesses note that the ranks of local Taliban units are swelling with soldiers and commanders from Central Asia. If Islamic State’s appeal spreads to the north of Afghanistan, the ISIS threat to Central Asia will rise sharply.

It is not surprising that since spring, Tajikistan has been keen to draw the attention of its partners under the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) to the need for more thorough monitoring of the situation in Afghanistan, and to keep the organization on high alert should the situation deteriorate. Russia has the final say on CSTO matters, and for Russian foreign policy the influence of ISIS in Afghanistan is a serious challenge.

The challenge is common to both Russia and China. Unsurprisingly, the situation in Afghanistan was widely discussed at the recent SCO summit in Ufa, the final declaration of which expressed concern about the rise in international terrorism, spoke of the intention to combat religious extremism, and announced supportive efforts aimed at establishing peace in Afghanistan. The Ufa-launched process of admitting Pakistan and India as SCO members could enhance the organization’s future capacity to address the problems of Afghanistan.

One should keep in mind that the circle of countries interested in the soonest possible settlement of the situation in Afghanistan is not limited to Pakistan, China, India and Russia. Fortuitously or otherwise, the news of the talks in Pakistan coincided with an article in The Washington Post by former General David Petraeus and senior fellow Michael O’Hanlon of the Brookings Institution. The authors recommend not only abandoning the idea of ​​a near-total withdrawal of US forces from Afghanistan before the end of 2016 (even US officials are now skeptical that it can be done), but, on the contrary, increasing America’s presence in the country. Their argument is that without the United States, Afghanistan will become a haven for Islamic terrorists, including those loyal to Islamic State.

Against the backdrop of events in Afghanistan today, this argument could chime, if not with ordinary Americans, then with the decision-makers; never mind that the last decade has illustrated the limitations of US policy in the resolution of Afghan issues. However, in collaboration with the SCO or its leaders, Russia and China, the potency of US efforts would increase significantly.

 

+
Like us on Facebook